Instead of changing SDEXTRASLOW variable to a slower speed,  the new
SDULTRASLOW is used for rigidbot panel.

Instead of changing SDEXTRASLOW variable to a slower speed,  the new
SDULTRASLOW is used for rigidbot panel.

Keep "astyled" reformatting

Add SDEXTRASLOW which runs the SD card at SPI_QUARTER_SPEED. Quarter speed is needed for RIGIDBOT_PANEL

PR#2572 Changed this because of faulty Boolean Logic

NOT(A OR (NOT B) OR (NOT C)) !=

(NOT A) AND ((NOT B) OR C))


Besides, the compiler should be smart enough to
optimize this without help from the programmer

Apply `ENABLED` / `DISABLED` macros to files needing only a small
number of changes.

Makes the output on the LCD adjustable.

When one hit "Stop Print" option in LCD menu, the command buffer was not
cleared. The printer keep moving until the buffer has been emptied.
Actually I could not clear the command buffer as well.. I don't know
why, it doesnt work as expected.
I need to implement a routine inside Stepper ISR to handle such
situation.

- Apply standards to cardreader.*
- Fix minor issues with cardreader.cpp
- Apply standards to some other stale regions

Introduced lcd_strlen() and lcd_strlen_P().
Replaced the old functions where necessary.
Reworked language_ru.h.

Speeded up test for zero length string in cardreader.cpp

Replace instances of the number 13 with FILENAME_LENGTH where
appropriate.

Replace instances of the number 13 with FILENAME_LENGTH where
appropriate.

For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.

With this option, always keeps the dir in RAM, doubling as a cache for
getfilename. A board with only 8K of SRAM is cutting it very close.

First iteration of alphabetical sorting for SD cards, both
slow+efficient and fast+rammy. Option for folders to sort first, last,
or not at all.

For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.

With this option, always keeps the dir in RAM, doubling as a cache for
getfilename. A board with only 8K of SRAM is cutting it very close.

First iteration of alphabetical sorting for SD cards, both
slow+efficient and fast+rammy. Option for folders to sort first, last,
or not at all.

For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.

# The first commit's message is:
SD Card Alpha Sorting

First iteration of alphabetical sorting for SD cards, both
slow+efficient and fast+rammy. Option for folders to sort first, last,
or not at all.

# This is the 2nd commit message:

Expand on More RAM concept, address minor bugs

# This is the 3rd commit message:

Improvements, more SORT_USES_MORE_RAM

With this option, always keeps the dir in RAM, doubling as a cache for
getfilename. A board with only 8K of SRAM is cutting it very close.

# This is the 4th commit message:

Completed SORT_USES_MORE_RAM implementation

For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.

For the MORE_RAM option we need to buffer both the short and long
names, even though long names are sometimes redundant. Worst case, all
the names are max length. We can save some RAM by not storing these. We
could save more RAM by only storing the visible part of the long name.

With this option, always keeps the dir in RAM, doubling as a cache for
getfilename. A board with only 8K of SRAM is cutting it very close.